Much of my January writing meme has been less than perfectly coherent. To some degree I'm just trying to give a picture of things that interest me, as a way of revealing more about my interests than I would just saying "hm" in the background. But I feel like I'm spending so much time dredging up old memories, or just describing things in an awkward and cursory fashion, that I'm not writing much analysis, nor much interesting, nor much that coheres as a whole essay.

In yesterday's post about C. S. ("Jack") Lewis I forgot something critical I have recently realized and really wanted to say:

Jack had a tendency to write his works with a fair bit of Throw It In, and sometimes I suspect He Just Didn't Care. More precisely, a lot of his fantastical work seems driven by coming up with a novel scene, image, relationship, or other concept, and using it, whether or not it was consistent with the rest of the larger work.

This can be a good thing. Narnia's world is hugely diverse, because Jack kept throwing new creatures in. It can be annoying, as when ideas that fit into an End of the World story led to The Last Battle, so we can have images like Stars falling from the sky. Never mind that he's closing the book on further stories, he has a cool image!

The first Narnia book treats Narnia as a land of Talking Animals who know not Men, contrasted to England as a land of Men who know not Talking Animals. The later books take this concept and show lands of Men who know not Talking Animals outside Narnia but in the same world (The Horse and His Boy) or within Narnia itself (Prince Caspian), thus making Narnia oddly curious in its own world. But that was what he wanted to do there. The Caspian-era books almost make Narnia a human kingdom in a fantastic world. And the timeline of Dawn Treader's backstory still seems confused to me. But it's Throw It In.

Similarly, the line in Perelandra which bugged me so much. Jack thought of that bit of "logic," so he put it in a character's mouth, because it occurred to him, never mind philosophical consistency.

It's different from a writer who worries and worries at things to make them more consistent. It does however mean that those following on, fans and ficcers, get stuck with what one threw in.
(Topic, and title phrasing, suggested by odditycollector)

I saw it said once that Tumblr is a party. I think that's a fair characterization. I can see it as a sort of image host, and a friendlier one than the old image hosts with their grey interfaces and irritating ads. Taken as these things, Tumblr is fine.

But for a social community site, it is (as is Twitter, as is Facebook) a step backwards from the journal site model of LiveJournal/Dreamwidth.

Now, I think there are parts of Tumblr that "don't make sense" to an old journal-site user, but do make sense on their own terms. I want to, for the most part, leave aside things that are annoying about Tumblr but make some kind of sense, which should leave only a few things:

One: If I “<3”/like/heart a response to something, that is counted the same as hearting the original post as far as the original poster knows (or, for that matter, anyone outside the specific chain of respondents in the response I hearted). That’s confusing.

Further, it at least used to be the case that one could not “<3” something if the original post was no longer there—as I recall. I’ve not tested that lately.

Two: In theory, I could rewrite this entire post into a rabid denunciation of the Irish race after y’all “like” it, and it would still count as you “liking” it. Oy.

Three: You can have 153,546 notes on a post, most of which are noise, and not be able to find many of the actual comments, if any. You can fold a Disqus thread in if you are inclined, and some people do, but Tumblr itself is, well, shaped like itself. I’ve grown to like its strange forking threads, but they’re not organizedly archived to be tracked down, they’re wild moments of a long party that still leaves scrambled tracks on the servers. So once a thread gets big enough, fuggeddaboudit.

Related: I have known a few users to try to use Tumblr as a blog for general readership or as a webcomic host. It mostly worked, too—for other Tumblr users. Unless they added Disqus, outsiders found the inability to comment annoying.

Four: The biggest problem I have may be this: On Dreamwidth or LiveJournal, I can organize the blogs I follow into filtered categories. So if I want to just look at my real-life friends, or just communities, or just fans of Wonder Woman, I can (with a little work) set up filters to do that. Of the new models of social media, I think only Google+ lets me do that with a single account.

Tumblr lets me run multiple blogs, thus splitting my output for other’s consumption, and organize my own posts with tags, but doesn’t let me organize my friends’ feeds. So I end up doing a lot of unfriending just to be able to keep up. And don’t you have that one friend who overspams but you can’t quite bring yourself to get rid of, so you end up reading a lot of their reblogs and reblogging them yourself until you feel like an echo? That’s a thing here.

Five: I almost hate to add this, because I like the flexibility of design in Tumblr themes. But it’s a journalish site, not a GeoCities page, so here goes:

A lot of Tumblr skins themes don’t have date stamps. I once had reason to try to explain that a depressed friend’s suicide note on Tumblr was actually posted in the previous few hours, and I remembered seeing it new in that timeframe on my dashboard, and if I logged into my dashboard and found the post there, I could read the date that way. But no way on the blog itself to confirm. And I was in any case talking to a someone in another state over the phone, so they couldn’t really have without making an account, which was too much trouble. “It was in the last two hours, I remember, just trust me.”

Six: No screens! Really? I can “hide” a post (even from myself), put down the URL somewhere and then send you the URL so you (and anyone with the URL) can see it. If I do, it will not show up in anyone’s dashboard; not mine, not my best friend's. So keeping track of those is hard. But Tumblr can’t have something screened so only certain people can see it, and yet they will see it automatically—a core function of LJ, which LJ does easily.

Anyway, lately, I am realizing that LJ had a really good basic design, and more recent stuff has been inferior in the interest of being different. An old acquaintance has lately returned to LJ after deciding that Facebook required too much personal vagueness.

Wow. I thought I’d have two or three things. I came up with six!

But I do like Tumblr as its own kind of thing, and it does come up with fun threads in its own way.

Profile

philippos42

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
222324 25 26 2728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags